關於Zoos的意思和用法的提問

"Zoos"有關的其他問題

Q: Zoos around the world provide people with the opportunity to enjoy and learn about animals that they do not usually have the chance to see. However, despite these benefits, it is unkind to keep animals in zoos. Do you agree?
-----------------------------------------------------

Thousands of creatures live in zoos across the world. Where Scientists and researchers do various types of study on them as well as billions of individuals can see animals and learn abought them. Although some believe that putting them behind the cage is against the ethic; I argue that in zoos, they can get better shelter and cure.


Governments spend billions of dollars to provide good quality food to animals who live in conservation parks. When meat-eaters spend their lives in the jungle, many times they have to loiter without eating food as they do not catch any prey for their appetite, but in zoos, they can receive time to time meals. In my area, in the Sayaji zoo, all creatures get three times food in a day. Due to this, all mammals look much healthier. This is one of two reasons I do not support the thought that keeping animals in zoos is against kind.

Also, animals suffer from numerous deadly diseases and it could be really tough to provide aid to them in the jungle but in zoos, this is very easy and they suffer less. In the shelters, authorities allocate several veterinary doctors who frequently measure animals daily routine and health and do necessary treatment when required. In Sayaji zoo, four animal doctors daily measure creatures body temperature as well as look after their food to provide wellbeing.

In conclusion, zoos give a chance to people to observe animals closely and gain knowledge abought them. However, some feel that keeping them in a small place is not good for their well-being. I completely disagree with this statement as zoos are the best place to cure them than the jungle.
A: Really great job!

Zoos around the world provide people with the opportunity to enjoy and learn about animals that they do not usually have the chance to see. However, despite these benefits, it is unkind to keep animals in zoos. Do you agree?
-----------------------------------------------------

Thousands of creatures live in zoos across the world. Scientists and researchers do various types of studies on them and billions of individuals can see the animals and learn about them. Although some believe that putting them in a cage is against ethics, I argue that in zoos, they can get better shelter and cures.


Governments spend billions of dollars to provide good quality food to animals who live in conservation parks. When meat-eaters spend their lives in the jungle, many times they have to loiter without eating food as they do not catch any prey for their appetite, but in zoos, they can receive timed meals. In my area, in the Sayaji zoo, all creatures get food three times a day. Due to this, all of the mammals look much healthier. This is one of two reasons I do not support the thought that keeping animals in zoos is against ethics.

Also, animals suffer from numerous deadly diseases and it could be really tough to provide aid to them in the jungle, but in zoos this is very easy and they suffer less. In the shelters, authorities allocate several veterinary doctors who frequently measure animals daily routine and health and do necessary treatment when required. In Sayaji zoo, four animal doctors measure creatures body temperature daily as well as look after their food to provide wellbeing.

In conclusion, zoos give a chance for people to observe animals closely and gain knowledge about them. However, some feel that keeping them in a small place is not good for their well-being. I completely disagree with this statement as zoos are a better place to cure them than the jungle.

有關單詞和短語的意思和用法

最新單字

zoos

HiNative是用戶之前互相交換知識的問答平台。

最新問題
最新問題(HOT)
矚目的提問