關於Terrorism的意思和用法的提問
"Terrorism" 的翻譯
Q:
terrorism用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說？
A:
請到提問詳情頁確認
Q:
combating terrorism, what does it mean? combat?用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說？
A:
In this case, "to combat" means "to fight against" or "to win against". "Combat" alone typically means fighting someone or fighting in a war.
So you could also say "fighting terrorism" or "fighting against terrorism" or "winning against terrorism" instead of "combating terrorism".
So you could also say "fighting terrorism" or "fighting against terrorism" or "winning against terrorism" instead of "combating terrorism".
Q:
terrorism 用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說？
A:
請到提問詳情頁確認
Q:
terrorism, i try to say but i can't😂用 英語 (美國) 要怎麼說？
A:
@Alinageh: tear-or-iz-im
tear pronounced like I'm going to tear this paper.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/terrorism?q=Terrorism
Hope this helps!
tear pronounced like I'm going to tear this paper.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/terrorism?q=Terrorism
Hope this helps!
"Terrorism"有關的其他問題
Q:
Correct me:
If terrorism was your concern, ISIS would be your enemy
If terrorism was your concern, ISIS would be your enemy
A:
Looks good - very natural (although if you want to use formal grammar it should be: If terrorism were your concern, ISIS would be your enemy.)
Q:
What does “whoa there cool it with the terrorism talk” mean?
>The federal government is lame
whoa there cool it with the terrorism talk
>The federal government is lame
whoa there cool it with the terrorism talk
A:
whoa there => something like ちょっと in Japanese
cool it with ~ = do less of ~
terrorism talk = either "talking like a terrorist" or "talking about terrorism". From the context, it's the former here.
So basically: Wait a minute, don't talk like a terrorist.
cool it with ~ = do less of ~
terrorism talk = either "talking like a terrorist" or "talking about terrorism". From the context, it's the former here.
So basically: Wait a minute, don't talk like a terrorist.
Q:
If happen terrorism in Germany, we scared “Europe” as well as New York we scared “America”. These things are context of the Asian hates crime. The Covid-19 appeared in China but some people thinking from “Asia”
We aren’t supposed to decide something without right knowledge.
もしテロがドイツで起こったら私たちはヨーロッパが怖いと思い、同じ様にニューヨークで起きたらアメリカが怖いと思う。コロナによるアジア人差別はこれらのような事が背景にある。中国から始まったが、中にはアジア全体として考えている人もいる。正しい知識無しに何かを決断するべきではない。
Is this natural? By the way, I don’t mention to China. There’s nothing wrong with China.
We aren’t supposed to decide something without right knowledge.
もしテロがドイツで起こったら私たちはヨーロッパが怖いと思い、同じ様にニューヨークで起きたらアメリカが怖いと思う。コロナによるアジア人差別はこれらのような事が背景にある。中国から始まったが、中にはアジア全体として考えている人もいる。正しい知識無しに何かを決断するべきではない。
Is this natural? By the way, I don’t mention to China. There’s nothing wrong with China.
A:
"If a terrorist act occurred in Germany, we would be afraid of going anywhere in Europe, just as if it occurred in New York, we would be afraid of going to America. This is the reasoning behind some of the Asian hate crimes. Covid-19 originated in China but there are people who think of it as coming from Asia as a whole. We must not make judgements without the proper knowledge."
Q:
Can you check and correct my English?
"Can international terrorism ever be eliminated?
I think terrorism cannot be eliminated for the following three reasons: bad international relations, lack of military action, and historical background.
First, the relationship between some countries, for example, Japan and China, and Japan and Russia doesn't seem good. Japan fought with these two countries in the war in the past, and then the war ended. However, the presidents of each country have many controversial items. Russia claims that some islands belong to them, but they are Japanese. Moreover, China claims that an ocean is theirs, but it is Japanese. These points may cause terrorism.
Second, in Japan, for example, they are unflexible with using military power because of a part of the Japanese constitution. Therefore, other countries such as ISIS look down on Japan, and they take the people to their countries to kill them or to get ransom instead of doing so. Terrorists know that Japan can't take any actions on the military point, so they freely do terrorism.
Third, like one in America in 2001, terrorism has existed since more than ten years ago. A kind of fights which offend one country is not easy to stop soon. Even if one terrorism ends in one place, another one occurs in another place. Like this, a cycle of nightmare continues.
In conclusion, as long as the notion "foreign countries" and the idea to monopoly other countries'islands exist, we can't eliminate terrorism. One terrorism generates a next terrorism."
"Can international terrorism ever be eliminated?
I think terrorism cannot be eliminated for the following three reasons: bad international relations, lack of military action, and historical background.
First, the relationship between some countries, for example, Japan and China, and Japan and Russia doesn't seem good. Japan fought with these two countries in the war in the past, and then the war ended. However, the presidents of each country have many controversial items. Russia claims that some islands belong to them, but they are Japanese. Moreover, China claims that an ocean is theirs, but it is Japanese. These points may cause terrorism.
Second, in Japan, for example, they are unflexible with using military power because of a part of the Japanese constitution. Therefore, other countries such as ISIS look down on Japan, and they take the people to their countries to kill them or to get ransom instead of doing so. Terrorists know that Japan can't take any actions on the military point, so they freely do terrorism.
Third, like one in America in 2001, terrorism has existed since more than ten years ago. A kind of fights which offend one country is not easy to stop soon. Even if one terrorism ends in one place, another one occurs in another place. Like this, a cycle of nightmare continues.
In conclusion, as long as the notion "foreign countries" and the idea to monopoly other countries'islands exist, we can't eliminate terrorism. One terrorism generates a next terrorism."
A:
I believe terrorism cannot be eliminated for the following three reasons: poor international relations, lack of military action, and historical background.
First, the relationships between some countries don't seem very strong. China and Japan, Japan and Russia are a few examples. In the past, Japan fought with those countries, and its presidents are guilty of many controversies. Russia claims that some islands belong to them, but they are Japan's. Furthermore, China claims that an ocean is theirs, but it is of the Japanese. Those are all concerns which may cause terrorism.
Second, in Japan for example, they are inflexible about using military power because of a restriction placed by the Japanese constitution. Therefore, states such as ISIS look down on Japan, and they kidnap Japanese people to kill them or to get ransom. Terrorists know Japan can't take military action, so they freely perform acts of terrorism.
Third, like the 2001 incident in America, terrorism has existed for more than ten years. Such attacks which offend a country are not easy to stop. Even if terrorism ends in one place, another one occurs somewhere else. Like this, a cycle of nightmare continues.
In conclusion, as long as the concept of "foreign countries" and the idea to monopolize other countries' islands exist, terrorism will be difficult to eliminate, and terrorism breeds more terrorism.
First, the relationships between some countries don't seem very strong. China and Japan, Japan and Russia are a few examples. In the past, Japan fought with those countries, and its presidents are guilty of many controversies. Russia claims that some islands belong to them, but they are Japan's. Furthermore, China claims that an ocean is theirs, but it is of the Japanese. Those are all concerns which may cause terrorism.
Second, in Japan for example, they are inflexible about using military power because of a restriction placed by the Japanese constitution. Therefore, states such as ISIS look down on Japan, and they kidnap Japanese people to kill them or to get ransom. Terrorists know Japan can't take military action, so they freely perform acts of terrorism.
Third, like the 2001 incident in America, terrorism has existed for more than ten years. Such attacks which offend a country are not easy to stop. Even if terrorism ends in one place, another one occurs somewhere else. Like this, a cycle of nightmare continues.
In conclusion, as long as the concept of "foreign countries" and the idea to monopolize other countries' islands exist, terrorism will be difficult to eliminate, and terrorism breeds more terrorism.
Q:
what do you think terrorism ?
A:
I think you mean "What do you think about terrorism?" Or "What are your thoughts on terrorism?"
有關單詞和短語的意思和用法
最新單字
terrorism
HiNative是用戶之前互相交換知識的問答平台。
最新問題
- 沒關係 和 沒事 的差別在哪裡？
- あなたに贈るプレゼントを選ぶのが私も楽しみです、 いつも迷って結局多くなる。用 中文 (繁體，臺灣) 要怎麼說？
- 夜に変な雑音が頻繁に発生すると、喧嘩して眠れないことがあります。 何度も言い聞かせて聞きません。用 中文 (繁體，臺灣) 要怎麼說？
- 「葬り去った芙莉蓮」は山田鐘人原作、阿部司が描いた漫画で、アニメなどの派生作品もある 物語は魔王を倒した後の「後」に起こり、生命の奔流の意味を検討している。 魔法使いであるエルフリリアンは他の3...
- うっかりしました。 ど忘れしました。用 中文 (繁體，臺灣) 要怎麼說？
最新問題(HOT)
- 超扯了是什麼意思
- 不甜 和 不過甜 和 不会太甜 的差別在哪裡？
- 讀書と閱讀是什麼意思
- 感覺動物的意思是什麼？感覺現在基本沒有什麼人用這個詞語了
- “阿熙，這樣做不值得，我是不會回到你身邊的。” in this sentence she said 是不會. what does 是 in 是不會 mean in this context a...
矚目的提問