Question

更新於 2020年4月9日

2020年4月6日

韓語

英語 (美國)
日語

問題已關閉

有關 英語 (美國) 的問題

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.

Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"?

答覆

Khadijah111

2020年4月9日

最佳解答

英語 (美國)

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence

分享此問題

Copy URL

Khadijah111

2020年4月6日

英語 (美國)

Yes for is necessary as it indicates the reduction is needed

Orchid11111

2020年4月6日

韓語

@Khadijah111 I just referred to an English dictionary and it says the verb "reduce" is a transitive verb. So I think the verb should be followed by an object without a preposition. I mean we don't say that we should reduce for infected cases.

Khadijah111

2020年4月9日

英語 (美國)

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence

[通知]Hi! 正在學習外文的你

你知道如何提升自己的外語能力嗎❓你要做的就是讓母語者來訂正你的寫作！
使用HiNative，免費讓母語者來幫你訂正文章✍️✨

註冊

分享此問題

Copy URL

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.

Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"?

相關提問

相同關鍵字的提問

矚目的提問

最新問題(HOT)

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"? 查看翻譯

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduceAt least that's how I saw the sentence

Yes for is necessary as it indicates the reduction is needed

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduceAt least that's how I saw the sentence

‎When the Congress debates health care, they try to find ways to reduce for medical malpractice litigation, which is one of the most expensive aspects of medicine.

Q. Is "for" necessary in that sentece? in between "reduce" and "medical malpractice litigation"?

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence

@Orchid11111 here reduce is used for reduction of something else like money....with for a reason is give as why they reduce

At least that's how I saw the sentence