Question
更新於
2020年4月11日

  • 波蘭語
  • 英語 (英國)
  • 韓語
  • 西班牙語 (西班牙)
有關 英語 (英國) 的問題

Can we together solve the problem with the degradation of climate?
To answer that question we have to ask a few another. Who is responsible for climate change? How to force the biggest poisoners to change their proceedings? Do the unity's actions signify anything? Our age gained the name - "Anthropocene" - it shows how much humanity affected on our planet.
Let's forget for a while about the climate-changing taking place on the Earth before the emergence of human and to not compare these changes with the ones being done by us. Since XVIII so the Industrial Revolution, the factories have been set up, fossil fuels, such as coal and oil have been taken up and burned up, the transport has been developing,
the massive farmsteads, where many animals are raised - producing a huge amount of methane. To set up the cornfields the forests are being chopped down. Industry and inbreeding need a lot of water. We can see a lot of changes because of that kind of actions: the raising of the temperature, changing the seasons, melting of the glaciers, desertification of the soil. We breathe the air of poor quality.
What can we do as people conscious of the situation - the future disaster? The countries can line up to establish the reduction of CO2 emission but not everyone wants to (China, India). Many of them, for example, Poland in the majority uses coal to heat the spaces. It's hard to convince people to switch to the renewable source the energy, also it causes enormous costs. The European Union donates the poorest Member States but it lost with no direction when the most significant lands don't need to help the environment. The most dangerous are the holders of a high position with no imagination when the profit is more important than the world's fortune. It's alarming that some time ago the people were mocking the others warning of climate change. Although nowadays we know about the issue. What can do the normal human being? Not much. Of course, we need to save water and power, plant trees, segregate waste, use bikes and public transport instead of cars, stop using plastic packagings or minimalise eating meat. But individual actions won't have effects. The whole world must start taking care of the planet. Sadly it means that we will have to resign from the comfort. Not all of us will be ready to change their everyday life. Except for that, the citizens must wield influence on politicians, cause then it can give us change of the law.
So, coming back to the original question, yes, we can do it together by forcing a new, less consumable lifestyle or vote in the elections for the candidates having an eco ticket. Only the solidarity of everybody will be successful.


I'm writing an essay about climate change and can we fight it doing it together. Can I ask you about correcting the mistakes I've made?
答覆
查看更多留言

  • 英語 (英國)
  • 葡萄牙語 (巴西)

  • 英語 (英國)
  • 葡萄牙語 (巴西)
[通知]Hi! 正在學習外文的你

分享此問題
	Can we together solve the problem with the degradation of climate?
To answer that question we have to ask a few another. Who is responsible for climate change? How to force the biggest poisoners to change their proceedings? Do the unity's actions signify anything? Our age gained the name - "Anthropocene" - it shows how much humanity affected on our planet. 
	Let's forget for a while about the climate-changing taking place on the Earth before the emergence of human and to not compare these changes with the ones being done by us. Since XVIII so the Industrial Revolution, the factories have been set up, fossil fuels, such as coal and oil have been taken up and burned up, the transport has been developing, 
the massive farmsteads, where many animals are raised - producing a huge amount of methane. To set up the cornfields the forests are being chopped down. Industry and inbreeding need a lot of water. We can see a lot of changes because of that kind of actions: the raising of the temperature, changing the seasons, melting of the glaciers, desertification of the soil. We breathe the air of poor quality.
What can we do as people conscious of the situation - the future disaster? The countries can line up to establish the reduction of CO2 emission but not everyone wants to (China, India). Many of them, for example, Poland in the majority uses coal to heat the spaces. It's hard to convince people to switch to the renewable source the energy, also it causes enormous costs. The European Union donates the poorest Member States but it lost with no direction when the most significant lands don't need to help the environment. The most dangerous are the holders of a high position with no imagination when the profit is more important than the world's fortune. It's alarming that some time ago the people were mocking the others warning of climate change. Although nowadays we know about the issue. What can do the normal human being? Not much. Of course, we need to save water and power, plant trees, segregate waste, use bikes and public transport instead of cars, stop using plastic packagings or minimalise eating meat. But individual actions won't have effects. The whole world must start taking care of the planet. Sadly it means that we will have to resign from the comfort. Not all of us will be ready to change their everyday life. Except for that, the citizens must wield influence on politicians, cause then it can give us change of the law.
	So, coming back to the original question, yes, we can do it together by forcing a new, less consumable lifestyle or vote in the elections for the candidates having an eco ticket. Only the solidarity of everybody will be successful.
相同關鍵字的提問
矚目的提問
最新問題(HOT)
最新問題
上一個問題/下一個問題

免費向母語者提出問題