Question
更新於
2020年4月11日
- 波蘭語
-
英語 (英國)
-
韓語
-
西班牙語 (西班牙)
有關 英語 (英國) 的問題
Can we together solve the problem with the degradation of climate?
To answer that question we have to ask a few another. Who is responsible for climate change? How to force the biggest poisoners to change their proceedings? Do the unity's actions signify anything? Our age gained the name - "Anthropocene" - it shows how much humanity affected on our planet.
Let's forget for a while about the climate-changing taking place on the Earth before the emergence of human and to not compare these changes with the ones being done by us. Since XVIII so the Industrial Revolution, the factories have been set up, fossil fuels, such as coal and oil have been taken up and burned up, the transport has been developing,
the massive farmsteads, where many animals are raised - producing a huge amount of methane. To set up the cornfields the forests are being chopped down. Industry and inbreeding need a lot of water. We can see a lot of changes because of that kind of actions: the raising of the temperature, changing the seasons, melting of the glaciers, desertification of the soil. We breathe the air of poor quality.
What can we do as people conscious of the situation - the future disaster? The countries can line up to establish the reduction of CO2 emission but not everyone wants to (China, India). Many of them, for example, Poland in the majority uses coal to heat the spaces. It's hard to convince people to switch to the renewable source the energy, also it causes enormous costs. The European Union donates the poorest Member States but it lost with no direction when the most significant lands don't need to help the environment. The most dangerous are the holders of a high position with no imagination when the profit is more important than the world's fortune. It's alarming that some time ago the people were mocking the others warning of climate change. Although nowadays we know about the issue. What can do the normal human being? Not much. Of course, we need to save water and power, plant trees, segregate waste, use bikes and public transport instead of cars, stop using plastic packagings or minimalise eating meat. But individual actions won't have effects. The whole world must start taking care of the planet. Sadly it means that we will have to resign from the comfort. Not all of us will be ready to change their everyday life. Except for that, the citizens must wield influence on politicians, cause then it can give us change of the law.
So, coming back to the original question, yes, we can do it together by forcing a new, less consumable lifestyle or vote in the elections for the candidates having an eco ticket. Only the solidarity of everybody will be successful.
Can we together solve the problem with the degradation of climate?
To answer that question we have to ask a few another. Who is responsible for climate change? How to force the biggest poisoners to change their proceedings? Do the unity's actions signify anything? Our age gained the name - "Anthropocene" - it shows how much humanity affected on our planet.
Let's forget for a while about the climate-changing taking place on the Earth before the emergence of human and to not compare these changes with the ones being done by us. Since XVIII so the Industrial Revolution, the factories have been set up, fossil fuels, such as coal and oil have been taken up and burned up, the transport has been developing,
the massive farmsteads, where many animals are raised - producing a huge amount of methane. To set up the cornfields the forests are being chopped down. Industry and inbreeding need a lot of water. We can see a lot of changes because of that kind of actions: the raising of the temperature, changing the seasons, melting of the glaciers, desertification of the soil. We breathe the air of poor quality.
What can we do as people conscious of the situation - the future disaster? The countries can line up to establish the reduction of CO2 emission but not everyone wants to (China, India). Many of them, for example, Poland in the majority uses coal to heat the spaces. It's hard to convince people to switch to the renewable source the energy, also it causes enormous costs. The European Union donates the poorest Member States but it lost with no direction when the most significant lands don't need to help the environment. The most dangerous are the holders of a high position with no imagination when the profit is more important than the world's fortune. It's alarming that some time ago the people were mocking the others warning of climate change. Although nowadays we know about the issue. What can do the normal human being? Not much. Of course, we need to save water and power, plant trees, segregate waste, use bikes and public transport instead of cars, stop using plastic packagings or minimalise eating meat. But individual actions won't have effects. The whole world must start taking care of the planet. Sadly it means that we will have to resign from the comfort. Not all of us will be ready to change their everyday life. Except for that, the citizens must wield influence on politicians, cause then it can give us change of the law.
So, coming back to the original question, yes, we can do it together by forcing a new, less consumable lifestyle or vote in the elections for the candidates having an eco ticket. Only the solidarity of everybody will be successful.
To answer that question we have to ask a few another. Who is responsible for climate change? How to force the biggest poisoners to change their proceedings? Do the unity's actions signify anything? Our age gained the name - "Anthropocene" - it shows how much humanity affected on our planet.
Let's forget for a while about the climate-changing taking place on the Earth before the emergence of human and to not compare these changes with the ones being done by us. Since XVIII so the Industrial Revolution, the factories have been set up, fossil fuels, such as coal and oil have been taken up and burned up, the transport has been developing,
the massive farmsteads, where many animals are raised - producing a huge amount of methane. To set up the cornfields the forests are being chopped down. Industry and inbreeding need a lot of water. We can see a lot of changes because of that kind of actions: the raising of the temperature, changing the seasons, melting of the glaciers, desertification of the soil. We breathe the air of poor quality.
What can we do as people conscious of the situation - the future disaster? The countries can line up to establish the reduction of CO2 emission but not everyone wants to (China, India). Many of them, for example, Poland in the majority uses coal to heat the spaces. It's hard to convince people to switch to the renewable source the energy, also it causes enormous costs. The European Union donates the poorest Member States but it lost with no direction when the most significant lands don't need to help the environment. The most dangerous are the holders of a high position with no imagination when the profit is more important than the world's fortune. It's alarming that some time ago the people were mocking the others warning of climate change. Although nowadays we know about the issue. What can do the normal human being? Not much. Of course, we need to save water and power, plant trees, segregate waste, use bikes and public transport instead of cars, stop using plastic packagings or minimalise eating meat. But individual actions won't have effects. The whole world must start taking care of the planet. Sadly it means that we will have to resign from the comfort. Not all of us will be ready to change their everyday life. Except for that, the citizens must wield influence on politicians, cause then it can give us change of the law.
So, coming back to the original question, yes, we can do it together by forcing a new, less consumable lifestyle or vote in the elections for the candidates having an eco ticket. Only the solidarity of everybody will be successful.
I'm writing an essay about climate change and can we fight it doing it together. Can I ask you about correcting the mistakes I've made?
答覆
查看更多留言
- 英語 (英國)
- 葡萄牙語 (巴西)
Can we solve the problem of the climate degradation together?
To answer that question we, have to ask one another. Who is responsible for climate change? How do we make the the biggest polluters change their ways? Do the unity's actions signify anything? Our age bears the name ‘Anthropocene’ to show us how much humanity has affected our planet.
For now, let's forget about the climate-changing taking place on the Earth before the emergence of humankind, and not compare these natural changes with the man-made ones. Since the 1800s, and hence the Industrial Revolution, factories have been established, fossil fuels such as coal and oil have been expended and burned up and transport has been developing, along with massive farmsteads — producing a huge amount of methane. To set up cornfields, for example, expenses of our forests are being chopped down. Additionally, industry and agriculture need a lot of water, exhausting our already fragile supply. We can already see many changes because of these kinds of actions: the raising of the temperature, changing the seasons, melting of glaciers and desertification of the soil. We even breathe the air of poor quality.
What can we do as people conscious of the situation - the disaster that lies in our future? Countries could line up to establish the reduction of CO2 emissions, but not everyone all are on board (e.g. China, India). Many of them, for example, Poland especially, use coal as a main energy source for heating. It's difficult to convince people to switch to renewable sources the energy, especially as it causes enormous costs. The European Union donates to the poorest Member States, but is losing influence as the most significant lands don't need to help the environment.
The most dangerous threat to the environment are the holders of high positions with no sense, when fleeting profit is more important than the world's fate. It's alarming that some time ago people were mocking the scientists warning us of climate change. Although nowadays, we know about the issue. What can the average person do? Not much. Of course, we need to save water and power, plant trees, segregate waste, use bikes and public transport instead of cars, stop using plastic packagings or minimalise eating meat. But, nonetheless, individual actions won't have effects. The whole world must start taking care of the planet. Sadly, it means that we will have to resign from many comforts of modern life. Not all of us will be ready to change their everyday lives. However, we as citizens must use our influence on politicians, because only then can it give us change to the law.
So, coming back to the original question, yes, we can do it together by enforcing a new, less consumerism-based lifestyle, or by voting in elections for candidates having an eco ticket. Only the solidarity of everybody will bring success.
You were very close with most things, I just reworded it slightly so that it makes a bit more sense. There are a few areas that are still a bit clunky, but it seems pretty good so far. Well done — I hope this helps, and good luck with your essay!
這個回答有幫到你嗎?
- 波蘭語
- 英語 (英國)
- 葡萄牙語 (巴西)
[通知]Hi! 正在學習外文的你
你知道如何提升自己的外語能力嗎❓你要做的就是讓母語者來訂正你的寫作!
使用HiNative,免費讓母語者來幫你訂正文章✍️✨
使用HiNative,免費讓母語者來幫你訂正文章✍️✨
註冊
相關提問
相同關鍵字的提問
- I have a problem about expression on Lang-8.
- No problem 和 It doesn't matter 的差別在哪裡?
- Told how to solve the problem, I could solve it easily. (I read this sentence in my grammer te...
矚目的提問
- are these natural? Her eyes are extraordinarily beautiful. he runs extraordinarily fast. the mo...
- Roll up!の意味はなんですか?
- "have you ever seen any fireflies" vs "have you ever seen any firefly" which one sounds better?
- Does this sound natural? Nowadays there're a lot of updates one of them is social media. As we ...
- What is the correct way to say this? Have you had dinner? Did you have dinner? Or something else??
最新問題(HOT)
- 感覺動物的意思是什麼?感覺現在基本沒有什麼人用這個詞語了
- 四月十六日 星期二 多雲 最近來,我的無線藍牙耳機常常出了毛病。最常見的是只有一邊有聲音。還有時聲音會中斷,只好從頭開起再設定好。我買這已經三年了,是不是差不多該換新的了?
- ”相處“ 「付き合う」という意味がありますが、恋愛としてですか、それとも人と人の付き合いという意味ですか、それともどちらの意味もあるのですか?
- 特別是在我們國內進行的改革以及會談上引起對方對我們的信心信賴,不僅為現在艱難的環境做出貢獻,也有助於展現我們所做的努力為回應對方部分政黨及國民對自己的懷疑:『為什麼我們要以犧牲自己為代價來保護秩...
最新問題
- 我也第一次登山,那我們算都是新手 這句很自然嗎?
- この表現は、正しいですか? ↓ 毎日日常家事や、一つの事を継続していたら、 何か問題が起きても、慌てずに解決することができる。気持ちは、乱されないですむ。 これは、昨日母が私に言った言葉です。 ...
- バイト(居酒屋)で使う単語やフレーズを教えてください。
- 你知道許光漢嗎? →知ってます、彼は「想見你」と言うドラマにに出てた人ですよね? 中文怎麼說?
- Do you know the name of the song at 1:31? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqZyGkZAxX4
上一個問題/下一個問題
謝謝!請放心,你的意見並不會顯示給其他用戶
謝謝您的回應!您的反饋將會作為改善服務體驗的參考!