Question
更新於
2021年3月5日
- 英語 (英國)
- 印地語
-
英語 (美國)
-
德語
有關 英語 (美國) 的問題
mere 和 trivial 的差別在哪裡?如果不好說明,請提供一些例句。
mere 和 trivial 的差別在哪裡?如果不好說明,請提供一些例句。
I am not able to get it on google. pls help. thanks
答覆
2021年3月5日
最佳解答
- 英語 (美國)
This is a really hard question.
The difference is very subtle. Both are adjectives, but they are used in different ways.
Trivial means a thing of little or no importance and is categorical. Something that is trivial is very commonplace or can be ignored.
Mere is a comparative. Something that is called mere is only mere in comparison to something greater.
In some cases the two words are interchangeable, but not always.
"Joe was a mere delivery boy." -- suggests that within his employer's organization, Joe was low-ranking, but might be promoted to a better position." It's a criticism.
"Joe was a trivial delivery boy." -- suggests that Joe was unimportant because all delivery boys are unimportant. It's a condemnation.
The second example can also be read to suggest that, among delivery boys generally, Joe is a particularly unimportant one.
"It was a mere paragraph." -- suggests that the topic might have deserved a longer essay, or that the reader might have expected more information, but the author only wrote a single paragraph about it.
"It was a trivial paragraph." -- suggests that among all the other paragraphs in an article, this one paragraph said little of significance.
"It was a mere mistake." -- implies that it was only a mistake, not a malicious act.
"It was a trivial mistake." -- implies that as mistakes go, it was not a disastrous mistake. It was a small or unimportant mistake.
For mere, you can usually substitute "just," "only," "but," or "simply."
"It was only a mistake." "It was but a mistake." "It was simply a mistake." "It was just a mistake."
Trivial has a noun form, trivia. Trivia are unimportant or insignificant things.
You can say that "People's opinions about hairstyles and TV shows are trivia." but you can't do the same thing with the word "mere."
However, you can say that "People's opinions about hairstyles and TV shows are mere trivia." But then, you can't say that "People's opinions are trivially mere."
The adverb forms, "merely" and "trivially," also differ in use.
One could say, "I merely asked a question," implying that I did nothing extraordinary.
One would not say "I trivially asked a question."
I'll look into this some more and get back to you.
查看更多留言
- 英語 (英國)
- 英語 (美國)
Hmm, this is kind of difficult. I think it differs from what words it's used with. For example, you usually say "a trivial matter" - "a *mere* matter" sounds weird so please use "a trivial matter".
You usually use "a mere _____" before a noun, so "a mere commoner", or "a mere child".
So, they have the same meaning, but if you remember to use "mere" before a noun then you'll be good.
高評價回答者
- 英語 (英國)
- 印地語
so that means we need to use mere before noun (it's more natural) and trivial with others... they both mean the same
am I right?
am I right?
- 英語 (英國)
- 英語 (美國)
@mannatsaxena2 Yup! But also remember that if you ever say "matter" then use "trivial" if you wanna describe it that way. I don't know why, but it's never written as "mere matter" lol
高評價回答者
- 英語 (英國)
- 印地語
- 英語 (美國)
This is a really hard question.
The difference is very subtle. Both are adjectives, but they are used in different ways.
Trivial means a thing of little or no importance and is categorical. Something that is trivial is very commonplace or can be ignored.
Mere is a comparative. Something that is called mere is only mere in comparison to something greater.
In some cases the two words are interchangeable, but not always.
"Joe was a mere delivery boy." -- suggests that within his employer's organization, Joe was low-ranking, but might be promoted to a better position." It's a criticism.
"Joe was a trivial delivery boy." -- suggests that Joe was unimportant because all delivery boys are unimportant. It's a condemnation.
The second example can also be read to suggest that, among delivery boys generally, Joe is a particularly unimportant one.
"It was a mere paragraph." -- suggests that the topic might have deserved a longer essay, or that the reader might have expected more information, but the author only wrote a single paragraph about it.
"It was a trivial paragraph." -- suggests that among all the other paragraphs in an article, this one paragraph said little of significance.
"It was a mere mistake." -- implies that it was only a mistake, not a malicious act.
"It was a trivial mistake." -- implies that as mistakes go, it was not a disastrous mistake. It was a small or unimportant mistake.
For mere, you can usually substitute "just," "only," "but," or "simply."
"It was only a mistake." "It was but a mistake." "It was simply a mistake." "It was just a mistake."
Trivial has a noun form, trivia. Trivia are unimportant or insignificant things.
You can say that "People's opinions about hairstyles and TV shows are trivia." but you can't do the same thing with the word "mere."
However, you can say that "People's opinions about hairstyles and TV shows are mere trivia." But then, you can't say that "People's opinions are trivially mere."
The adverb forms, "merely" and "trivially," also differ in use.
One could say, "I merely asked a question," implying that I did nothing extraordinary.
One would not say "I trivially asked a question."
I'll look into this some more and get back to you.
- 英語 (英國)
- 印地語
@alexsn the difference might be difficult to explain but your explanation changed it to a very easy thing to understand.... thanku so much , for the additional information too.
- 英語 (英國)
- 印地語
- 英語 (美國)
The adjective mere means "being nothing more than what is specified." For example, "a mere man" means that someone is just a man and nothing more. "A mere job," means a job that has no value other than its pay, and is not also a passion or a hobby.
- 英語 (英國)
- 印地語

[通知]Hi! 正在學習外文的你
你知道如何提升自己的外語能力嗎❓你要做的就是讓母語者來訂正你的寫作!
使用HiNative,免費讓母語者來幫你訂正文章✍️✨
使用HiNative,免費讓母語者來幫你訂正文章✍️✨
註冊
相關提問
-
mediocre 和 trivial 的差別在哪裡?
回答Saying something is mediocre is like saying something is not very good, medium in quality. Trivial is something unimportant or meaningless.
-
mere 和 just 的差別在哪裡?
回答Sometimes merely and just can be interchanged but quite often they can't. For example, "just" can also mean righteous, like a "just king". It...
-
plainly 和 frankly 的差別在哪裡?
回答Plainlyと franklyの違いはありません。意味はおなじでさ。'Can I speak plainly?' and 'Can I speak frankly?' mean the same thing.
-
mere是什麼意思
回答Do you mean here?
-
trivial 和 negligible 的差別在哪裡?
回答trivial: superficial, not important negligible: insignificant, very unimportant to the point that it can be disregarded
-
trivial 和 mundane 和 banal 和 and witch one is more common if you mean something not original, tha...
回答I don't think that I have heard banal before, but trivial and mundane are used slightly differently Trivial means that something doesn't have...
-
marginally 和 slightly 的差別在哪裡?
回答marginally is an extremely small change, slightly is a small change. marginally < slightly
-
trivial 和 insignificant 的差別在哪裡?
回答well trivial 사소한 and insignificant 휘장의 so the main difference here is. insignificant means it doesn't matter, when trivial means it matters o...
-
mere 和 trivial 的差別在哪裡?
回答This is a really hard question. The difference is very subtle. Both are adjectives, but they are used in different ways. Trivial me...
-
請提供關於 mere 的例句給我。
回答I think it is a mere coincidence. He works for a mere pittance He is a mere child. Although Bailey was a mere boy, he knew he would become a ...
相同關鍵字的提問
矚目的提問
- I asked a question about you. 和 I asked a question of you. 的差別在哪裡?
- Okay 和 Okey 的差別在哪裡?
- man 和 men 的差別在哪裡?
- hope everything goes well 和 hope everything's going well 的差別在哪裡?
- 31th 和 31st 的差別在哪裡?
最新問題(HOT)
最新問題
- 欠佳 和 不好 的差別在哪裡?
- 所以有我在嘛 和 所以有我嘛 和 所以我在嘛 的差別在哪裡?
- 充足 和 足夠 的差別在哪裡?
- 企業概論 和 企業倫理 的差別在哪裡?
- 被你喜欢是我最大的荣幸 和 你喜欢我是我最大的荣幸 的差別在哪裡?
上一個問題/下一個問題