Electronic voting has been highly controversial in the world. Some nations are considering the implementation of electronic voting system while many nations are concerned about the unpleasant ramifications of electronic voting. This essay describes that the drawbacks or hindrances of implementing electronic voting far outweigh the benefits for the following three reasons.

To begin with, introducing Internet voting system is very costly to build and maintain.
Despite the fact that labor costs, such as organizing an election or counting ballots, can be cut, it cannot be denied that initial costs and maintenance fees for the system, which will be paid from tax.

Another downside of voting over the internet is that electoral malpractice is likely to burgeon.
For example, radical political groups may intimidate electorate to vote for a certain political party or illegally buy other people’s right to vote in order to let it win. This kinds of fraud will undermine the foundation of democracy.


Last not but least, system glitch or failure are inevitable if governments introduce electronic voting. Also, computer viruses that stop the system and the act of hacking that, even more badly, manipulate the election result are significant threats. Being unable to ensure the safety of election, electronic voting should not be promoted.

To sum up, electronic voting should not be promoted because of poor cost-effectiveness, threat to democracy, and inevitable system failures.
聼起來自然嗎?

Electronic voting has been a highly controversial topic in the world as of late.

Some nations are considering theimplementing implementationan of electronic voting system while many nations are concerned about the unpleasant ramifications of electronic voting.

ThisThrough three clauses, this essay describes that the drawbacks or hindrances of implementing electronic voting farand how they outweigh the benefits for the following three reasons.

To begin with, introducing Internetan internet voting system is very costly to build and maintain.

Despite the fact that labor costs ,(e.g. such as organizing an election or counting ballots), can be cut, it cannot be denied that initial costs and maintenance fees for the system, whichwould will be paid fromby taxtaxpayers.

Another downside of online voting over the internet is that electoral malpractice is more likely to burgeonoccur.

For example, radical political groups may intimidate the electorate to vote for a certain political party or illegally buy other people’s right to vote in order tofor lettheir itparty winto succeed.

This kindskind of fraud willcan underminecompromise the foundation of democracy.

Last not but least, system glitchglitches orand failure are nearly inevitable if governments introduce electronic voting.

Also,Other computersignificant virusesthreats thatwould stopbe thecomputer systemviruses and the act of hacking that, evenwhich morecan badly,stop manipulatethese thehypothetical electionsystems resultand areaid significantin threatsmanipulating election results.

BeingBecause unableof its inability to ensure theelection safety of election, electronic voting should not be promoted.

ToIn sum upconclusion, electronic voting should not be promoted because of poor cost-effectiveness, threat to democracy, and inevitable system failures.