Question
更新於
答覆
2017年10月31日
最佳解答
- 英語 (美國)
自然
Yes, the comma after "strict" is necessary. The comma is there to continue the sentence. If you replace the comma with a period, the sentence is now, "Japanese government's interpretation of the definition of refugee status is beyond strict." Now the sentence is just a statement. The comma is there to continue the sentence into the description of the statement sentence. Therefore the comma is necessary.
You did very well. Good job!
這個回答有幫到你嗎?
查看更多留言
- 英語 (美國)
自然
Yes, the comma after "strict" is necessary. The comma is there to continue the sentence. If you replace the comma with a period, the sentence is now, "Japanese government's interpretation of the definition of refugee status is beyond strict." Now the sentence is just a statement. The comma is there to continue the sentence into the description of the statement sentence. Therefore the comma is necessary.
You did very well. Good job!
這個回答有幫到你嗎?
已刪除帳號的用戶
Thank you!!!!
Sorry... you are 100% sure about the comma is necessary right?
I am sorry this sentence is really important for me...
- 英語 (美國)
自然
@saltlong Sorry that my response is 5 days late but yes. The comma is there to create pause, and the pause makes the sentence split between the statement and the statement explanation.
這個回答有幫到你嗎?
[通知]Hi! 正在學習外文的你
你知道如何提升自己的外語能力嗎❓你要做的就是讓母語者來訂正你的寫作!
使用HiNative,免費讓母語者來幫你訂正文章✍️✨
使用HiNative,免費讓母語者來幫你訂正文章✍️✨
註冊
相同關鍵字的提問
- "what is your interpretation of that case?" (Exam question) Should I say: "I will suspect that h...
- interpretation是什麼意思
- Your interpretation is not correct. 聽起來自然嗎?
上一個問題/下一個問題
謝謝!請放心,你的意見並不會顯示給其他用戶
謝謝您的回應!您的反饋將會作為改善服務體驗的參考!